France Going Down a Different Route with #Fracking, #Nuclear, #Solar and #Renewables

I was fascinated to read of the upholding of an absolute ban on fracking in France.  This appears to be coupled with plans to enact a 
carbon based tax on other fuels, and a tax on nuclear, with proceeds to go towards promotion of renewables.


There have also been a recent number of papers, for example here,  that indicate when the total social costs are properly considered, renewables emerge as a favored alternative (possibly with nuclear) ahead of conventional or new fossil alternatives.  Of course, as technology advances (and our understanding of the best way to valorize consequences evolves), this perspective might change.

But the picture emerging is that conventional economic analysis, which ignores “externalities” may not be up to the task of correctly informing decision making in the energy sector.

Vive La France.

The Environmental Pyramid

A powerful meme in environmental engineering is the pyramid.  I first encountered this when I was working on hazardous waste in the 1980’s.  In that context, the pyramid has the more preferable alternatives (e.g. waste prevention) towards the base.  In recent years, the inverted pyramid has become more popular, and I think it more preferable, since it includes the more preferred alternatives on the top.  An example of this in the waste management context is:



This meme has broad utility outside the waste management hierarchy, and integrates well with the general movement towards sustainability.  Let me give two examples.

In water supply when additional sources are needed, this meme might include (going from the top of the inverted pyramid to the bottom):

  • Use reduction (conservation) (most preferred)
  • Internal recycling (e.g. recycling within a building or block — for example, use of cooling water for toilet flushing)
  • System wide reuse (and possible dual supply)
  • Abstraction of water from a new source and treatment

In energy supply, a possible set of hierarchies might be:

  • Demand reduction (conservation, incentives, …)
  • Internal recycling (heat recovery; energy recovery from on-side discarded materials)
  • System wide re-engineering of energy consumptive processes and operations
  • Abstraction of new sources (with ranking based on environmental/sustainability metrics)

Using such memes, in making decisions it should be incumbent on decision makers (and their consultants) to indicate why upper levels of the pyramid might not be feasible, might be too costly, might impose other environmental risks, etc., before proceeding to lower levels of the pyramid.

How do we train/retrain students, practitioners and the public towards this goal?